I've put a very early draft of a paper up here. The paper looks at how a believer in classical (or intuitionistic etc.) logic might seek to justify the claim that anything follows from a contradiction to a sceptic. I argue that if the sceptic holds that nothing follows from a contradiction the believer's arguments can be resisted.
Comments welcome - email me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSimon Hewitt, Archives
July 2018
Categories |